MAKNA BHISAMA KESUCIAN PURA (Kajian dari perspectif Arsitektur)
Abstract
In Balinese society, it’s recently been occurred an emotional debate and dispute of argumentation related to the content of Bhisama Kesucian Pura (temple sacred agreement). An assessment is the realistic distance which emerges as an interpretation to Bhisama Kesucian Pura that will be decreased or narrowed. It’s  the critical point that’s possible to be a further discussion centre item and then, advanced questions  are : (i) “how many ideal quantitative values for the content of Bhisama Kesucian Pura do we convert?â€, (ii) “could it be 3 (three)  kilometers, 4 (four) kilometers or more?â€. That’s the continued discourse which can be proposed in the hermeneutic study. And the proposed study seems that the result doesn’t contribute the problem solving but it could be to emphasize on the emerging problem analysis. By a few refining on the analysis, it’s proposed to the next study process.  Analytic scheme of thinking in the study is a deductive nature that’s   hypothetically-tentatively looking for the logic & ethic meaning on the content of Bhisama Kesucian Pura. It’s said an hypothetic term because the truth (regarding the content of Bhisama Kesucian Pura) still need indeed to be tested its meaning anymore from the reflective thinking process perspective. It’s said to be a deductive term because the early study setting comes from the empiric of non assumption but it derives from human’s thinking or  intellectual capability to try constructing an abstraction and simplification of an idealism of human’s world. And it’s said tentative item because the deductive concept is still give a chance to the other value choice that  reflectively needs to be tested by its meaning anymoreReferences
Adhimastra, I Ketut (2001). Saka dalam Arsitektur Tradisional Bali, Suatu Kajian Teknologi – Estetik – Konstruktif (dimuat pada majalah Ilmiah Universitas Dwijendra “Widyasrama†Desember 2001)
Adhimastra, I Ketut (2002). Sikut Pekarangan dalam Arsitektur Tradisional Bali, Suatu Perbandingan dengan Rumusan Arsitektur Modern (dimuat pada majalah Ilmiah Universitas Dwijendra “Widyasrama†September 2002)
Adhimastra, I Ketut (2003). Implementasi Antropometri pada Gegulak Bangunan Bali dari sudut pandang Nilai Ideal, Instrumental dan Praktis. (dimuat pada proseding Seminar Nasional Ergonomi di Yogyakarta 5 April 2003. ISBN-979-95752-4-9)
Anonim, 1945. Asta Kosali (L.05.A). Alih aksara oleh Gelebet dari aslinya dalam aksara Bali milik Pedanda Made Sidemen dari Geria Taman Sanur, Denpasar.
Gelebet, IN. 1982. Arsitektur Tradisional Daerah Bali. Inventarisasi dan Dokumentasi Kebudayaan Daerah Bali tahun 1981/1982.
Gelebet, IN. 1984. Landasan Filosofis Gegulak dan Penerapannya. Disampaikan dalam Sabha Arsitektur Bali.
Kagami, H. 1988. Balinese Traditional Architecture In Process. Little World Museum of Man, 90-48 Imai-Narusawa, Inuyama, Aichi, 484 JAPAN.
KEPUTUSAN PARISADA HINDU DHARMA INDONESIA PUSAT (PHDIP), Nomor : 11/KEP.I/PHDIP/1994 tanggal 25 Januari 1994 Tentang Bhisama Kesucian Pura
Kerthiyasa dan Tim Perumus Sabha Arsitektur, 1984. Rumusan Arsitektur Bali. Hasil Sabha Arsitektur Tradisional Bali.
Nala, I Gusti Ngurah (2004). Murddha Agama Hindu. Upada Sastra, Denpasar;
Ngoerah, IGNG; dkk. 1981. Inventarisasi Pola-pola Dasar Arsitektur Tradisionil Bali. Laporan Penelitian Direktorat Pembinaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Pendit S Nyoman, (2007). Sad Dharsana, Pustaka Bali Post - Denpasar
Sumaryono E (1983). Hermeneutik, Sebuah Metode Filsafat, Penerbit Kanisius - Jakarta
Suamba, Putu IB (2003). Dasar-dasar Filsafat India. Program Magister Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan Universitas Hindu Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Penerbit Widya Dharma;
Saifuddin, A. 1999. Dasar-dasar Psikometri. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
