Language Function As A Support To Teachers’ Professionalism

Main Article Content

Kadek Adyatna Wedananta
I Gusti Ayu Indah Triana Juliari

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study seeks to determine the functions of language for the professionalism of teachers who must communicate and convey information or material to students. This study employed a qualitative methodology. This research was conducted in schools located in Denpasar, Bali, with teachers as its subjects. The language functions utilized by the teacher can be mapped as follows: 44 phatic functions (23%), 34 metalingual functions (18%), 34 referential functions (18%), 34 conative functions (18%), 25 emotive functions (13%), and 19 poetic functions (10%). From the results of the study, it can be concluded that language functions in their professionalism as teachers, namely a phatic function that facilitates socialization and interaction between teachers and students; a metalingual function that teaches students the vocabulary they have not yet mastered; a referential function plays a role in conveying topics, information, or material to students; a conative function allows teachers to instruct something to students; an emotive function serves to motivate or develop relationships between teachers and students; and a poetic function plays a role for teachers who need poetic or aesthetic language when providing examples of poetry or other literary works.
Keywords: Language Function, Professionalism, Teachers

Article Details

How to Cite
Kadek Adyatna Wedananta, & Indah Triana Juliari, I. G. A. (2022). Language Function As A Support To Teachers’ Professionalism. Widya Accarya, 13(2), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.46650/wa.13.2.1328.224-232
Section
Articles

References

Brikci, N. 2007. A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology. Guiding Book. London: Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Style in Language Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. Style in Language, 351–377
Junaidi, F., Mustopa, E., Putra, A., Aryanto S. (2020). Analisis Fungsi Bahasa dalam Komunikasi Adat Bejeghum: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Jermal: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Vol. 1 No. 2.
Junieles, R., Arindita, S. F. (2020). Karakteristik dan Fungsi Bahasa Iklan Bisnis Layanan Aplikasi Chatting di Youtube. Konfiks: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran.
Manoliu, M. N. (2017). Functions of Language and Elements of Poetry. International Journal of Communication Research, 7(1), 58.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1987).Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.).
Newmeyer. F.J. 1997. Generative Linguistics:An Historical Perspective. Google Books. p-170. 21 January 2014 Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary. Fourth Edition. 2008. Oxford University
Richard, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. 2010.Longman Dictionary of Language.
Richard, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (2002).Longman Dictionary of Language .
Putri, N. L. P. N. S. (2018). THE IMPACT OF PROJECT-BASED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT AND SPEAKING SKILLS. Widya Accarya, 9(2).
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syaiful Sagala.2009. Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta. Pg.21
The government rules of RI. No. 74 year 2008, Chapter 1 Section 1 Verse 3. 2014. Bandung: Citra Umbara. pg. 59
Tirtawati, A. A. R. (2016). Kesehatan mental sumber daya manusia para guru (implikasinya terhadap penyelenggaraan diklat/pelatihan). Widya Accarya, 5(1).
UU Republik Indonesia. No.14 year 2005. About Teacher and Lecture.Chapter 1 Section 1 Verse 1. 2014. Bandung: Citra Umbara. Pg.3
Wedananta, K. A. (2020). ANALYSIS OF INTERLINGUAL ERRORS IN ENGLISH IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. Widya Accarya, 11(2), 231-238.