PELAKSANAAN PIDANA TAMBAHAN PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KLUNGKUNG

I Komang Pasek  Gunadi

doi:10.46650/kd.v23i2.1586

I Komang Pasek Gunadi Kepolisian Daerah Bali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46650/kd.v23i2.1586

Keywords: Pidana Tambahan, Uang Pengganti, Korupsi, Additional Criminal, Compensation Money, Corruption

Abstract

The Attorney General's Office, in addition to its authority in carrying out prosecutions, also has the authority as executor to carry out court decisions. The problem that occurs in the implementation of additional criminal payments for replacement money is that the return of state financial losses is not yet optimal related to the authority of the Attorney General's Office as an institution tasked with executing a court decision. Therefore, to find out the problems in the implementation of this additional sentence, this research will be conducted at the Klungkung State Prosecutor's Office as one of the State Prosecutors' Offices in the jurisdiction of the Province of Bali. As for the formulation of the first problem, How is the implementation of additional criminal payment of replacement money at the Klungkung District Attorney's Office and what are the obstacles in implementing additional criminal payment of replacement money at the Klungkung District Attorney's Office. This study includes empirical legal research, using the nature of explanatory research. The data sources consist of primary data sources, secondary data. The data collection technique used in this research is interviews. The data analysis used in this research is qualitative analysis. Based on the results of the research that has been reviewed and described, the conclusions that can be conveyed are as follows, The implementation of additional punishment for payment of replacement money has not been perfect, so that the purpose of this additional punishment has not been optimally achieved. And second, obstacles in the implementation of the additional penalty for payment of replacement money at the Klungkung District Attorney, namely the existing legal regulations have not fully supported efforts to implement this additional penalty.

References

Aviva, F. N. (2023). Pengaruh Teori Positivisme Hukum dan Teori Utilitarianisme Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(4), 111-123.

Dewi, N. M. L., & Susila, I. P. A. (2020). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pembebasan Bersyarat Bagi Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIB Karangasem. Kerta Dyatmika, 17(2), 23-35.

Fajar, N. D. M. & Achmad, Y. (2007). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Febriani, S., & Lasmadi, S. (2020). Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Melalui Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 1-22.

Hiariej, E. O. (2013). Menyoal Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(1), 55-62.

Kristiana, Y. (2016). Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Thafa Media

Lukas, A. P. (2010). Efektivitas Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(2), 81-92.

Mahmud, A. (2017). Dinamika pembayaran uang pengganti dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 3(2), 137-156.

Pratama, A. S. H. (2020). Eksistensi Peranan Jaksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. Corruptio, 1(2), 75-90.

Rambey, G. (2016). Pengembalian kerugian negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi melalui pembayaran uang pengganti dan denda. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 137-161.

Sari, T. N., Sudarti, E., & Monita, Y. (2021). Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan oleh Jaksa Terhadap Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kejaksaan Negeri Muaro Jambi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 54-67.

Sidabutar, L. M. J. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan dalam Eksekusi Harta Benda Korporasi sebagai Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(2), 75-86.