KEBIJAKAN PEMBUKTIAN INSIDER TRADING PADA PASAR MODAL DI INDONESIA
Abstract
Insider trading constitutes one of the most challenging forms of crime in the capital market due to the high level of difficulty in its evidentiary process. This offense falls under the category of white collar crime, characterized by complex and often undetectable modus operandi. This research aims to analyze the legal policies governing the evidentiary process of insider trading in Indonesia's capital market, as well as to identify the obstacles encountered in proving such offenses. This study adopts a normative legal research method, employing statutory and case study approaches. The findings indicate that the prohibition of insider trading was initially introduced through Minister of Finance Decree No. 1548/KMK/013/1990, and later reinforced by Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market (UUPM). The UUPM regulates the enforcement of insider trading provisions through administrative, civil, and criminal channels. Proof of insider trading is pursued by detecting the involvement of insiders conducting transactions based on material non-public information, and examining parties suspected of committing the offense. However, several obstacles to proving insider trading remain, including the complexity of the modus operandi, the lack of criminal history among offenders, and the difficulty of quantifying and proving actual losses before the court. The study concludes that, although the legal framework for proving insider trading in Indonesia is in place, its enforcement remains significantly hindered. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen investigative mechanisms and inter-agency coordination to enhance accountability in the capital market.References
Abdullah, M. Z. (2017). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Insider Trading Di Dalam Pasar Modal. Jurnal Lex Specialis, (12), 11-19.
Amiruddin dan Asikin, H. Z. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Asril, J. (2019). Insider Trading Di Pasar Modal Sebagai Kejahatan Bisnis. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 3(2), 225-231.
Gisymar, N. A. (1999). Insider Trading Dalam Transaksi efek. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Purnama, W. W. (2020). Tantangan dan Peluang Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Insider Trading di Pasar Modal. Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 10(2), 134-141.
Rivelino, R., Abubakar, L., & Sudaryat, S. (2023). Penyelesaian Kerugian Investor Dari Praktik Insider Trading di Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3), 887-899.
Saputra, M. R. (2025). Analisis Hukum Atas Insider Trading Sebagai Kejahatan Bisnis Implikasi Dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Res Nullius Law Journal, 7(1), 34-47.
Syarief, E., & Balqist, A. (2017). Doktrin fiduciary duty dan corporate opportunity terhadap pertanggungjawaban direksi dan dewan komisaris. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 2(2), 80-102.
Syarief, E., & Junaidi, J. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas Terhadap Implikasi Praktik Insider Trading dalam Perdagangan Saham di Pasar Modal. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 6(1), 72-89.
Syazali, E. A. S. E. A., Irawan, A., Alfarisi, M. S., Ternando, A., & Rahman, R. (2022). Analisis Penegakan Hukum Insider Trading Di Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 6(2), 367-382.
Thalib, P., & Rachman, A. (2012). Mekanisme Penanganan Kejahatan Insider Trading Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Yuridika, 27(2), 173-182.
WIBAWA, I. G. L. A. A. (2024). Kebijakan Pembuktian Insider Trading Pada Pasar Modal Di Indonesia. Kerta Dyatmika, 22(1), 35-41.
Wibawa, S. (2009). Administrasi Negara: Isu-Isu kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu