Implementation of Industrial Design Rights Registration of Bone Carving Handicrafts in Tampaksiring Tourism Village of Gianyar District

Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi; I Wayan Partama Putra; Cok Gede Nata Wasistha

doi:10.46650/jsds.6.2.1598.64-72

Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi Universitas Dwijendra
I Wayan Partama Putra Department of Low, Low Faculty, Dwijendra University
Cok Gede Nata Wasistha Department of Low, Low Faculty, Dwijendra University, Denpasar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46650/jsds.6.2.1598.64-72

Keywords: Legal Protection, Industrial Design, Bone Carving Crafts

Abstract

The design of bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourist village of Gianyar Regency needs to be protected to ensure the protection of the rights of the designer and establish its rights and obligations as well as to keep unauthorized parties from misusing the industrial design. This is in accordance with Article 10, 11, 12 of Law Number 31 Year 2000 on Industrial Design. However, in its implementation, not all bone designs have received protection of Industrial Design Rights, so it is important to raise the issue: Implementation of Registration of Industrial Design Rights to obtain Legal Protection of Bone Carving Crafts in Tampaksiring Tourism Village. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of industrial design rights against bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourism village. The formulation of the problem in this study is 1). How is the implementation of industrial design rights registration against bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourist village, Gianyar regency? 2). How is the effectiveness of legal protection of industrial design rights to bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourist village, Gianyar regency. This research method uses the type of empirical legal research with qualitative analysis, with Non-Probability Sampling technique and by using Purposive sampling method which is described by using the theory of legal effectiveness, the theory of legal position, the theory of legal authority and the theory of legal protection. The conclusion of this study is the implementation of industrial design registration of bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourist village of Gianyar Regency is evident from the small awareness of individual craftsmen to register industrial design rights of craft products produced due to factors affecting the implementation of industrial design registration in the bone craft industry in Tampaksiring tourist village of Gianyar Regency, due to lack of awareness of craftsmen and lack of coordination and socialization regarding the importance of registration of industrial design rights to obtain legal protection. The effectiveness of legal protection of industrial design rights to bone carving crafts in Tampaksiring tourist village is not effective and optimal, it is caused by the mindset of craftsmen who think the process of registering industrial design rights is not too important and does not really affect the production of crafts produced, so that when a problem arises related to violations of industrial design rights in this case plagiarism of bone carving designs, then the law does not have the authority to take action against such violations and legal protection of the carving crafts cannot be realized because the bone carving crafts do not have legal legality. Bone Carving Craftsmen in Tampaksiring Village, Gianyar Regency think that the Certificate of Industrial Design Rights has not guaranteed legal protection for holders of industrial design rights which are their exclusive rights so that there are still many doubts of craftsmen who think that registration of industrial design rights is not too important to do

References

Anríquez, Arikunto & Suharsimi. (1996) Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta :

Dewi, Dewi, N M. L., Agung, A M. A. T. (2023). "Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Di Muka Umum Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi." Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH).Vol. 9 No. 1.

Dewi, N. M. T. (2021). "Perlindungan Hukum Hak Merek Dalam Persaingan Pasar Bebas Di Indonesia". Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia. Volume 4 No.2

Fajar, Achmad M. dan Yulianto. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Indradewi, A. Agung S., Ngurah, A., & Anak, A. I. V. (2021). "Efektifitas Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi terhadap Warga Negara Asing yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Visa di Bali." Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH). Volume 7 Nomor 2.

Rahayu, K. (2005). "Kajian Implementasi Prinsip-Prisnsip Perlindungan HaKi dalam Peratuaran Perundang - Undangan Haki di Indonesia”. Humanity Vol 1 No 1.

Supasti, D., N K, Wiryawan, Wayan. (2014) “Keberadaan dan Implikasi MFN dan NT Dalam Pengaturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Jurnal). Volume 3, Nomor 2. ISSN 2502-3101, h.267, URL:

Supasti, D., N. K. Wiryawan, Wayan . (2017). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Undang - Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang - Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1984 Tentang Perindustrian

Undang – Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 Tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization (Persetujuan Pembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia)

Undang – Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri

Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2000 Nomor 243

Widyastuti, L. (2010). "Ide dan kekayaan Intelektual", Media HKO-Buletin Indormasi dan keragaman Hak Vo. VII no 03