Authority Of The Internal Investigating Prosecutor Make Arrest And Detention Performers Of Criminal Acts  Of Corruption

I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana; Ni Made Liana Dewi; Ni Putu Ari Seni Antari

doi:10.46650/jsds.5.2.1487.39-46

I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana Universitas Dwijendra
Ni Made Liana Dewi Faculty of Law, Dwijendra University, Denpasar, Indonesia
Ni Putu Ari Seni Antari Faculty of Law, Dwijendra University, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46650/jsds.5.2.1487.39-46

Keywords: Criminal act of corruption, Prosecutor, Arrest, Detention

Abstract

Described problems in this research is what does the legal basis of the inventory in arrest and detention the corruptor. The objectives of this research is to know the legal basis of investigators in creating and handling the corruptor, and to know the obstacles contained incidence principles in catching and handling the corruptors. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical which is a study that refers to legal analysis. The approach in this study emphasizes the legislation approach that is the search for some legislation related to the investigation of corruption crime. The result of the research is indicate the normative juridical basis of the authority of the prosecutor in conducting arrest and detention in accordance to with article 16th KUHAP and article 20th KUHAP. Regarding the obstacles on the implementation of arrest and detention perfomance is related to the time of arrest the geographical position if indonesian associated shall create problems that does not allow the arrest within one day, other factors are the suspects escape and the dificulty to done so that inhibit persuit investigation process. Obstacles to detention may also be encountered by a suspect who refuses detention and insists not to be detained, the suspect flees and does not meet the conditoins of detention in article 21th KUHAP.

References

Chazawi,Adami,2005, Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang

Harahap, Yahya,2010.Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan) Edisi Kedua. Sinar Grafika.Jakarta.

Marapaung,Leden,2014,Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan) Bagian Pertama Edisi Kedua,Sinar Grafika,Jakarta.

Hartati,Evi,2012,Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika,Jakarta.

Kristiana,Yudi,2006,Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam penyididkan Korupsi,PT. Citra Aditya Bakti,Bandung.

Marbun,Rocky,dkk,2012, Kamus Hukum Lengkap,Transmedia Pustaka,Jakarta.

Hutabarat, D. T. H., Delardi, E., Irwansyah, A., Bascara, D., Ansori, B., Tanjung, F., ... & Silitonga, A. H. (2022). The Eradication Of Corruption And The Enforcement Of The Law In Indonesia As Seen Through The Lens Of Legal Philosophy. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 1(2), 1-8.

Satriana, I. M. W. C., & Dewi, N. M. L. (2022). Law Enforcement in The Process of Investigation on The Crime of Skimming by Foreign Nationals. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 11(1), 13-27.

Satriana, I. M. W. C., Dewi, N. M. L., & Dippayana, I. P. A. M. (2023). PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL CONTENT PERSPEKTIF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DI MASA YANG AKAN DATANG (IUS CONSTITUENDUM). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 9(2), 29-43.

Undang – Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang – Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Fatwa Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor KMA/102/III/2005 tentang Kewenangan Jaksa untuk menyidik perkara tindak pidana korupsi.